Welcome to the FluidFM forum

This community is for professionals and enthusiasts of our products and services. Share and discuss the best applications, experiments and new ideas, build your professional profile and become a better researcher together.

Please read the guidelines before participating in this community.


Why is the Effective Spring Constant important?

Maria Milla

What is the spring constant?

As the name implies the spring constant k [N/m] describes how much force [N] is needed to deform a spring system by a certain distance [m].

In case of the FluidFM probes, the spring constant relates the probe deflection in [m] with the corresponding force [N] that acts on the probe in order to achieve this deflection.


Measuring the spring constant

In the FluidFM system, the most common method to measure the spring constant is the Sader method. It relies on the probe dimensions and the first resonance peak of the probe’s thermal excitation spectrum. It is important to mention that this method gives the spring constant for a force acting perpendicular to the very end of the probe (more details can be found in Dörig, 2013).


The effective spring constant

In practice, the probe is at an angle to the surface and interacts at the pyramid, a few microns from its edge. The force needed to displace the cantilever by 100 nm increases as the point where the force is exerted  gets further away from the cantilever edge. For FluidFM nanopipettes, the place where the force is acting is the pyramid. In this case, the spring constant for forces at the pyramid tip can be calculated as following:

where kp is the spring constant at the pyramid, kmeas the measured spring constant according to Sader, l the length of the cantilever (typically 200 µm) and lp the length of the cantilever until the pyramid (typically 190 µm), or the length until the opening in case of the micro pipettes (193 µm) (Sader 1995). 

As seen through beam mechanics, pressing an inclined cantilever against a surface increases the required force to bend it. This is the case for FluidFM systems, where the cantilever comes with an angle of 11° towards the surface. In this particular case, the spring constant due to this angle will follow the following equation:


where ka is the modified spring constant due to the angle and the pyramid height D (7 µm). For colloidal probes, the colloid radius has to be added to D (Heim et al. 2004).

Finally, the effective spring constant, which takes into account the angle to the surface and the interaction with the pyramid (instead of the very end of the probe):



Typical correction factors

For typical FluidFM probes, the total correction factor for the spring constant is as follows:

FluidFM Probe Type


FluidFM Nanopipette & Nanosyringe


FluidFM Micropipette


FluidFM Micropipette with 10 µm colloid




Examples in Arya (For OMNIUM users)

The effective spring constant is calculated in Arya software after the QR code of the probe is scanned. In case the probe is not scanned, one can manually select the type of the probe in place, for the software to make the correction. Otherwise, if the probe is unknown, the software will not include the correction.


A: Beginning of the fitting range

B: Full width at half maximum (FWHM) lower boundary

C: Peak

D: Full width at half maximum (FWHM) upper boundary

E: End of the fitting range


J. E. Sader. Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Review of Scientific Instruments (1995), 66 (7), 3789.

L.-O. Heim, M. Kappl, H.-J. Butt. Tilt of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers: Effect on Spring Constant and Adhesion Measurements. Langmuir (2014), 20 (7), 2760-2764. 

P. Dörig. Manipulating cells and colloids with FluidFM. PhD thesis (2013).